The Theory of Evolution became the accepted explanation of origins not because it was demanded by the evidence, but because it was seized upon by people looking for a way to legitimize their rejection of God. For most, believing in macroevolution helps to quiet one’s conscience and tends to promote a false sense of security from the consequences of choosing to reject God. In this life, there will always be people who choose to reject God, and therefore some form of macroevolutionary philosophy will undoubtedly be promoted.

 

However, many have been led along by the massive propaganda campaign that has been in force throughout this century. These people have simply been blindsided by this outrageous lie and are not equipped to resist it. Hopefully, as more people begin to see the myriad of lies, contradictions, and exaggerations which prop up this most unreasonable theory, the truth will become self-evident.

 

Malcolm Muggeridge, world famous journalist and philosopher, had this to say about the future of the theory of evolution:

 

I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it’s been applied, will be one of the greatest jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has.1

 

Colin Patterson is an honest evolutionist who has come face to face with the empty lies of macroevolution. As senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London, he had this to say as he delivered his keynote address at the American Museum of Natural History in 1981:

 

One morning I woke up and something had happened in the night, and it struck me that I had been working on this stuff [evolution] for twenty years and there was not one thing I knew about it. That’s quite a shock to learn that one can be so misled so long. Either there was something wrong with me or there was something wrong with evolutionary theory . . . so for the last few weeks I’ve been putting a simple question to various people and groups of people. Question is: Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any one thing, any one thing that is true? I tried that question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, a very prestigious body of evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time and eventually one person said, “I do know one thing—it ought not be taught in high school.”2

 

Though Darwinian evolution is hailed as “fact” by the textbooks and popular media, Henry Morris illustrates the point that it doesn’t even qualify as a scientific theory, but rather an unlikely philosophical suggestion:

 

Evolution started with unknown chemicals

in the primordial past; through unknown processes

which no longer exist, it produced unknown life forms

which are not to be found,

but could, through unknown reproduction methods

spawn new life in an unknown atmospheric composition

in an unknown oceanic soup complex

at an unknown time and place.3