THE ABC'S OF REMEMBERING AND EXPLAINING THE PROBLEMS WITH THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION

Geologic Column

The Geologic Column delineating the geologic periods, found in every geology textbook and thought by most to be a faithful representation of the rock strata in the earth’s crust, is actually just imaginary. In fact, it doesn’t exist as a complete unit anywhere in the world. Geologist John Woodmorappe writes:

 

80-85% of the Earth’s land surface does not have even three geologic periods appearing in “correct” consecutive order . . . . Since only a small percentage of the earth’s surface obeys even a significant portion of the geologic column, it becomes an overall exercise of gargantuan special pleading and imagination for the evolutionary-uniformitarian paradigm to maintain that there ever were geologic periods. The claim of their having taken place to form a continuum of rock/life/time of ten biochronologic “onion skins” over the earth is therefore a fantastic and imaginative contrivance.1

 

Even in the Grand Canyon, only five out of the ten “geologic periods” can be identified.2  The Column was finalized in 1840,3 based not on observations of rock strata from a worldwide analysis, but purely on theory.

 

The very general groupings of plant and animal fossils found in the earth’s layers are interpreted by macroevolutionists as evidence for different time periods in which these different types of organisms lived. Creationists point out that the fossil layers correlate quite well with ecological zones. Therefore, it is logical to interpret the fossil layers not as geologic periods but as groupings of animals which all lived at the same time and were all successively buried within a very short time span (roughly one year, during a continent-covering flood).4

 

The fact that fossils and strata are often found out of the assumed evolutionary order, and that fossils such as trees (polystrate) have been found spanning numerous layers (when these layers are supposed to represent millions of years), is additional strong evidence that the evolutionary interpretation is false.

"...it is logical to interpret the fossil layers not as geologic periods but as

groupings of animals which all lived at the same time..."

 

Glen R. Morton

  1. John Woodmorappe, “The Essential Non-Existence of the Evolutionary Uniformitarian Geologic Column: A Quantitative Assessment,” Creation Research Society Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1 (P.O. Box 14016, Terre Haute, IN: June 1981), pp. 46-71, as cited in Taylor, Paul S. The Illustrated Origins Answer Book (Mesa, Arizona: Films For Christ Association, 1989), p. 99.
  2. William Waisgerber, George F. Howe, and Emmett L. Williams, “Mississippian and Cambrian Strata Interbedding: 200 Million Years Hiatus in Question,” Creation Research Society Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 4 (P.O. Box 14016, Terre Haute, IN: March 1987), pp. 160-167, as cited in Taylor, p. 40.
  3. Edmund M. Spieker, “Mountain-Building and Nature of Geologic Time-Scale,” Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Vol. 40 (August 1956), p. 1803 , as cited in Taylor, p. 99.
  4. Glen R. Morton, “Fossil Succession,” Creation Research Society Quarterly, Vol. 19 (P.O. Box 14016, Terre Haute, IN: 1982), pp.  90, 103-111, as cited in Taylor, p. 98.

 

Design, graphics and artwork copyright © 2016 Tim Beasley • All rights reserved.